Price: Varies, with both subscriptions and purchase available. It has lots of details but very few answers. However, don’t expect the documentation to be up-to-date or helpful. If you are supporting multiple systems, need back-ups to The Cloud, online storage or tape, or need to include servers in your back-ups, Retrospect should be considered. If you need backups of a single system, Retrospect is over-kill. This means you can buy it when you have cash from a project, then not worry about paying for it when you don’t. Equally important is that Retrospect supports both subscriptions and purchase. Which means, as a single user or small workgroup, you’ll never outgrow it. Unlike other backup software, Retrospect focuses on the enterprise. Ultimately, this review became an exercise in frustration. This is not the fault of the software, which I’m sure is good, but it is the fault of their documentation and tutorials. #Retrospect client windows 7 how to#When I said yes, they sent me a license for the multi-server edition of their Mac software.Īs you’ll read, Retrospect makes highly-respected software, but it is not intuitive, the video tutorials are woefully out of date and the User Guide explains the details but misses providing answers.Īfter two hours of reading and watching, I still haven’t figured out how to get the software to do a simple backup. Earlier this month, the folks at Retrospect asked if I’d be interested in reviewing the latest version of their software. I’ve used it in the past, but haven’t looked at it recently. #Retrospect client windows 7 drivers#This is not a general Windows problem, but just a limitation of certain drivers in the system.For 30 years, Retrospect has provided backup software for Windows and Mac systems. Increasing the default allows for all of the filters to have their own I/O stack location and everyone is happy. etc.) so the default IRPStackSize isn't large enough. You have too many filters in the particular stack (The number of requests each going through the layers of Antivirus, base filtering engine, ntfs, etc. A layer of drivers that utilize each other's services are typically referred to as a, "driver stack." #Retrospect client windows 7 driver#Windows uses a layered I/O model, where drivers attach to each other and utilize the services of the underlying driver to perform their work. "I also see random failures to open files in applications that try to access lots of files from the share." How do I know what the appropriate value is? Or should I just set to to the max of 50? However, why do I need to do this? Why would one Win7 machine have this problem and another not? They are all on the same domain, so group policy pushes down the same settings to them, some of which I've manually verified. I found that increasing the IRPStackSize on both my workstation and the client XP machine seems to make the problems go away. Microsoft publishes a cryptic knowledgebase article on the subject that suggests increasing IRPStackSize to fix the problem without any explanation as to why you would need to do so. I also see random failures to open files in applications that try to access lots of files from the share. I get various errors that seem to come and go (at some points it will work fine for hours). I received a new Windows 7 workstation (replacing an older Windows 7 workstation) and started running into errors accessing my file shares from Windows XP machines.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |